<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What Design Mistakes Can Hurt SEO? [Updated]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo</link>
	<description>All in One SEO Platform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 14:07:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.6.17</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>
		By: George Svash		</title>
		<link>https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo/comment-page-1#comment-80</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George Svash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rankactive.com/?p=7849#comment-80</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo/comment-page-1#comment-78&quot;&gt;Erin&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately, guys in Searchmetrics didn&#039;t put eCommerrce websites as a single point. Since there is no reliable statistics covering this topic, wen can only speculate around it. I reckon that if the number of images on the website doesn&#039;t affect it&#039;s loading speed and looks just fine, we can go for more than 2 images per page.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo/comment-page-1#comment-78">Erin</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, guys in Searchmetrics didn&#8217;t put eCommerrce websites as a single point. Since there is no reliable statistics covering this topic, wen can only speculate around it. I reckon that if the number of images on the website doesn&#8217;t affect it&#8217;s loading speed and looks just fine, we can go for more than 2 images per page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Erin		</title>
		<link>https://rankactive.com/blog/what-design-mistakes-can-hurt-seo/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://rankactive.com/?p=7849#comment-78</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found the survey result, &quot;websites ranked in TOP-10 do not have more than 2 images per page&quot; to be really interesting. I wonder how this changes for eCommerce websites, specifically product pages?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the survey result, &#8220;websites ranked in TOP-10 do not have more than 2 images per page&#8221; to be really interesting. I wonder how this changes for eCommerce websites, specifically product pages?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
